FIELD NOTES BLOG

World Population Day

Emma Zimmerman
July 10, 2024

On July 11, 1987, the global population reached 5 billion people, an event commemorated as the Day of 5 Billion. This milestone led to the establishment of World Population Day by the United Nations to raise awareness of the urgency of global population issues. Every year on July 11, we observe this day to reflect on population growth and its implications. Today, the world population exceeds 8 billion, which is nearly double what it was when World Population Day first began. World population can be a difficult topic to broach, so in honor of World Population Day, we are going to discuss the causes and effects of overpopulation, and their underlying presumptions for the future.

It took hundreds of thousands of years for the world population to grow to 1 billion, but only about 200 years to increase more than sevenfold. In 2010, the global population hit 7 billion, and it stands at 8.1 billion today. According to current UN projections, our population is expected to grow to 9 billion in 2037, and to 10 billion in 2058. The world population doubled from 3 billion in 1959 to 6 billion in 1999 and is estimated to increase by 50% over the next 40 years, reaching 9 billion by 2037. This exponential growth is staggering and incredibly hard to grasp. To put it in perspective, the current global population of 8.1 billion represents nearly 7% of all people who have ever lived on Earth. Simply stated, our population is growing too large and too quickly, putting us beyond Earth's sustainable means.


Overpopulation refers to a situation in which the Earth cannot regenerate the resources used by the world’s population each year. Experts say this has been the case every year since 1970 (the population then was ~3.7 billion), with each successive year becoming more and more damaging. Claiming that we are facing an overpopulation crisis is not hyperbolic, as our state of overpopulation is an indisputable fact. However, the conversation on overpopulation can become controversial and problematic when the question of who is responsible for, and what should be done about, the issue is broached. This question should under no circumstance be used as the framework to suggest that certain groups of people are to blame for the issue, and that certain groups of people have more of a right to the resources on Earth. Every human being has an equal right to a fair share of the Earth's resources. However, with a population over 8 billion, even if everyone adopted a modest standard of living the planet would still be pushed to its ecological limits. Unfortunately, the "average person" on Earth consumes resources at a rate over 50% above what is sustainable, and the average American consumes 5 times more than the planet's sustainable yield. As you’re probably piecing together, this is a recipe for an incredibly unsustainable situation. In order to mitigate this situation, we need to first understand the sources of overpopulation, and how this is affecting our Earth, from climate change to socio-political unrest. So let's talk about it.



In biology, we talk about populations in reference to a species carrying capacity, which is the number of individuals of a population that can be sustained by a given area. Once a population exceeds this threshold dieback will inevitably occur due to the ecosystem's limiting factors. These density-dependent factors include disease, competition, and predation, and they can have either a positive or a negative correlation with population size. With a positive relationship, these limiting factors increase with population size, restricting growth. Conversely, with a negative relationship, population growth is limited at low densities and becomes less restricted as it grows. When a species experiences overpopulation, these limiting factors intensify. The species will face higher rates of disease, greater food and water scarcity, and increased predation, all of which lead to a population decline. Humans, however, have altered this dynamic. Thanks to the agricultural revolution and modern medicine, we have effectively mitigated many of these limiting factors. This is great news for all of us on Earth today because we no longer have to worry about these things. However, it has also enabled our population to grow exponentially beyond Earth's carrying capacity.


Besides this, several other factors contribute to this growing population, including declining mortality rates, limited access to contraception, and inadequate education for girls. The primary cause of population growth is the imbalance between births and deaths. Infant mortality rates have decreased significantly, with 4.1 million infant deaths in 2017 compared to 8.8 million in 1990, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Simultaneously, lifespans are increasing worldwide, and current generations are likely to live longer than previous ones, as the global average life expectancy has more than doubled since 1900. These are remarkable achievements, but they contribute to an ever-growing population.


Lack of access to contraception in many parts of the world prevents women from planning their families. In fact, studies suggest that up to 44% of pregnancies worldwide are unplanned. Many studies also show that access to education plays a big role in how many children a woman will have. Although female access to education has increased over the years, the gender gap remains. Roughly 130 million girls worldwide are out of school currently, and an estimated 15 million girls of primary school age will never  learn to read and write, compared with 10 million boys. Education among women and girls reduced the amount of children women have by delaying childbearing to later ages, and increased workforce participation.


It’s important to note that women are having fewer children today than ever before. 50 years ago the global Total fertility rate (TFR) was around 5, meaning that on average women in the world had around five children. In 2024, the global TFR is 2.4. Women are on average having less than half of the children than previous generations, yet the global population is still rising – why? That is because there are more women in the age range to bear children than ever before. So even though there are less births on average, the current population increase is estimated at around 73 million people per year.


Overpopulation has many effects on our world, many of which we are witnessing today. As the global population continues to grow, the strain on our natural resources intensifies. More people means a higher demand for food, water, housing, and other essentials. Given the finite nature of these resources, this heightened consumption leads to ecological degradation. Overpopulation is already causing pressures that result in more deforestation, decreased biodiversity, and spikes in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, all of which exacerbate climate change. Climate change, of course, is making many areas inhospitable due to rising oceans and temperature, is causing the increase in the severity and frequency of natural disasters, and contributing to many other factors that  make our world inhospitable for humans.


Socially and economically, overpopulation can strain infrastructure and public services, leading to overcrowded cities, inadequate healthcare, and insufficient educational facilities, which ultimately lead to increased socio-economic disparities. The competition for limited resources can also lead to heightened tensions and conflicts within and between nations, as groups vie for control over water, land, and food supplies. We’re already seeing wars fought over water, land, and energy resources in the Middle East and other regions, and the turmoil is likely to increase as the global population grows even larger.

Moreover, the dense and overcrowded living conditions associated with overpopulation can facilitate the spread of infectious diseases, increasing the risk of pandemics. The ongoing deforestation and habitat destruction also bring humans into closer contact with wildlife, potentially exposing us to new zoonotic diseases.

Overpopulation remains a pressing global issue with far-reaching implications for our environment, resources, and socio-economic stability. Addressing overpopulation requires a multifaceted approach that includes promoting access to education, particularly for girls, and ensuring widespread availability of reproductive health services. Additionally, fostering a collective responsibility to manage Earth's resources sustainably is crucial. This means not only reducing individual consumption levels, especially in more affluent societies, but also supporting policies and practices that encourage sustainable living. While the challenges posed by overpopulation are significant, they are not insurmountable. By understanding the causes and effects of overpopulation and committing to collaborative and equitable solutions, we can work towards a future where both the human population and the planet can thrive. Observing World Population Day serves as a reminder of the urgency of this issue and the need for continued awareness and action to ensure a sustainable and just world for all.


RECENT ARTICLES

By Bruce Muench April 25, 2025
Forward:
By Rowan Mermel April 23, 2025
“Once you see it you can’t unsee it”
April 22, 2025
From the rugged peaks of the Rocky Mountains to golden desert canyons, the rolling prairies to the ancient, mist-shrouded Appalachian mountains — America is a land rich in many beauties. We are home to the towering redwoods of the west coast, sun-drenched coastlines in the south, and the deep blues of the Great Lakes that collectively hold the largest volume of freshwater on Earth. These wild places offer a kind of quiet that stirs the soul. This vast, varied land is what we proudly call “America the Beautiful.” And on Earth Day, this is the America we celebrate. We scroll through snapshots of National Parks, photos of mountain trails, canyon vistas, tidepools, and wildflower filled prairies. Maybe we've seen these places with our own eyes — maybe we carry them like a dream we hope to one day reach. We’ve all, in some way, been struck by the beauty of this land. As I write these words, I’m sitting at my desk looking out the window into the woodland of Severson Dells, watching the first green buds emerge, listening to the fluting whistles of returning songbirds. How lucky are we to live among such beauty? But that beauty is in danger. Today, mountaintops in Appalachia are being blown apart for coal, their peaks stripped and valleys buried in rubble. Ancient forests in the Pacific Northwest are leveled for lumber, their centuries-old trees felled in minutes. Oil rigs rise like metal skeletons in Alaska’s fragile tundra, while pipelines thread through sacred Indigenous lands and important wildlife corridors. Wetlands that once buffered our coastlines from hurricanes are drained and filled. Prairies, once stretching unbroken across the heart of the continent like an ocean of grass, are disappearing under pavement and plow. Our coastlines are receding. Our coral reefs, once vibrant, are dying, bleaching bone-white. Even here, outside my window, invasive honeysuckle strangles the understory where spring ephemerals once bloomed, and the chorus of birds is quieter than it used to be — a stark reminder that nearly one-third of North American bird populations have vanished in the past fifty years. But this isn’t a new story. Ours is not the first generation to witness the cost of ‘progress’. The tension between beauty and destruction has shaped this nation since the Industrial Revolution. And while the challenges we face today are daunting, they are not insurmountable. Every year, on April 22nd, we celebrate Earth Day – a day that itself was born from a moment not unlike our own. America of the 1950’s and 60’s is almost unrecognizable from the America we know today. In 1943, Los Angeles residents awoke one morning to skies so dark and chemical-laden they feared they were under a gas attack . It was smog. Just 5 years later, a lethal blanket of smog from zinc smelters in Pennsylvania killed 20 people in just three days . The Merrimack River in New Hampshire ran a different color each day , depending on what the local mills were dumping. And in 1969, Cleveland's Cuyahoga River — thick with oil and industrial waste — burst into flames , its smoke billowing four stories high. These weren’t isolated incidents. They were the symptoms of a larger crisis—one brought on by decades of industrial expansion with few, if any, environmental safeguards. At the same time that America was enjoying unprecedented prosperity, it was also polluting its air, poisoning its rivers, and sickening its people. The economy boomed, but the environmental consequences were growing harder to ignore. In 1962, a marine biologist named Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, a book that would become a cornerstone of the modern environmental movement. Carson’s work focused on the effects of chemical pesticides—especially DDT—on ecosystems and human health. She warned of a future without birdsong, where toxins accumulated in the food chain and sickened both wildlife and people. Silent Spring struck a chord. It didn’t just present scientific facts, it gave voice to a deep, growing unease. People were already noticing the changes around them: the absence of fireflies in summer, the increasing number of fish kills in local lakes, the haze that lingered over cities for days. Carson’s words helped connect the dots, and it didn’t just inform, it inspired, and from it spurred the beginning of the environmental movement. By the late 1960s, a wave of activism was sweeping the country. Young people were leading protests against the Vietnam War, civil rights leaders were marching for justice, and college campuses had become hotbeds of political energy. Watching this cultural shift with inspiration was Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin. A long-time advocate for environmental protection, Nelson saw how the antiwar movement had galvanized young people—and he wondered whether that same passion could be channeled into fighting a different kind of crisis: the growing threat to America’s air, water, and land. His sense of urgency only deepened in early 1969, when tragedy struck the California coast. A blowout at a Union Oil drilling platform off the coast of Santa Barbara spilled nearly 100,000 barrels of crude oil into the Pacific Ocean . Black sludge washed up on miles of pristine beaches. Seabirds lay dying under slicks of oil. Dolphins and seals washed ashore. The air reeked of petroleum for weeks. The images were devastating—and they were broadcast into homes across the nation. Senator Nelson knew the time to act was now. In November of that year, he announced plans for a "National Teach-In on the Crisis of the Environment" —a day when Americans would come together to learn, protest, and push for meaningful environmental change. This name was later changed to Earth Day, and the date chosen was April 22, 1970—strategically placed between spring break and final exams to ensure strong participation on college campuses.  To bring this ambitious vision to life, Nelson turned to Denis Hayes, a 25-year-old student activist. With Hayes’ help, a 7 month timeline, and a shoestring budget of just $124,000, Earth Day sparked an unprecedented nationwide movement. College campuses began planning teach-ins and events. Newspapers picked up the story. Civic groups, churches, and schools joined in. The momentum built quickly—and organically. Within a few months, the Earth Day idea had become a nationwide grassroots event supported by millions of people. Colleges campuses across the country organized “teach- ins”, and major newspapers were writing about Senator Nelson's ideas. Earth Day may have been Gaylord Nelson’s idea, but American citizens made it happen. “Earth Day worked because of the spontaneous response at the grassroots level,” reflected Gaylord Nelson. “It organized itself.” Historian Adam Rome would later call it “the most famous unknown event in modern American history.” On April 22, 1970, an estimated 20 million Americans—nearly 10% of the U.S. population at the time —participated in what remains the largest single-day political demonstration in the nation’s history. People from all walks of life gathered for marches, cleanups, rallies, and teach-ins. The message was clear: the environment mattered, and the public was ready to fight for it. What made Earth Day so powerful was not just its scale, but its unity. The movement crossed ideological lines. It was bipartisan, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. At a time of deep national division, Earth Day reminded Americans that the health of our planet is a shared responsibility—and a common cause. Even more remarkable is that this enormous, coordinated event was pulled off without the tools we rely on today. No social media. No email. No cell phones. Just passionate people, printed flyers, rotary phones, and the belief that change was possible. The success of Earth Day didn’t just move the public—it resonated with leaders in Washington, and led to real change. In just a few years, the United States went from having almost no federal environmental policy to enacting an environmental policy infrastructure strong enough to slow down the era of unregulated industrial sprawl to protect our planet and public health. The success of the first Earth Day led to the passage of some of the most important environmental legislation in American history, including: The Clean Air Act (1970) The Clean Water Act (1972) The Endangered Species Act (1973) President Richard Nixon oversaw the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency and signed the above landmark environmental laws into effect. In a 1970 speech, Nixon captured the spirit of the moment with a message that still rings true today: “The great question of the seventies is, shall we surrender to our surroundings, or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land, and to our water? Restoring nature to its natural state is a cause beyond party and beyond factions. It has become a common cause of all the people of this country. It is a cause of particular concern to young Americans, because they, more than we, will reap the grim consequences of our failure to act on programs which are needed now if we are to prevent disaster later. Clean air, clean water, open spaces—these should once again be the birthright of every American. If we act now, they can be. We still think of air as free. But clean air is not free, and neither is clean water. The price tag on pollution control is high. Through our years of past carelessness we incurred a debt to nature, and now that debt is being called. ” In the years that followed the first Earth Day, America made progress—rivers stopped catching fire, cities began to breathe a little easier, and wildlife rebounded. But the work was never meant to end in the 1970s. Earth Day is a reminder that the environment is not a limitless resource, and that protecting it requires action, accountability, and cooperation. Fifty five years later we face new environmental challenges, but Earth day is a reminder of what we can accomplish when we come together, regardless of party or background, to protect the natural world we all share. Today, the landmark pieces of legislation that were established in the 1970’s are under threat. The first hit to the Clean Water Act was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA, which significantly narrowed the Act's scope, limiting protections for wetlands and many streams. This ruling has led to a significant weakening of federal oversight. More recently, the EPA has announced significant changes to the Clean Water Act that potentially puts the drinking water sources for tens of millions of Americans at risk. As for the Endangered Species Act, there is a proposed rule change that would limit violations of the Act only to actions that hurt or kill animals. Harming the habitats the endangered animals need to survive would no longer be a violation of the Endangered Species Act, which would open large swaths of land to logging, mining and development that were previously protected. As we all know, if a species doesn’t have the habitat to survive and breed in then it will eventually go extinct. This proposed rule change is open for public comment until May 19 in the Federal Register, so please consider sharing your opinion . Additionally, there is the Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy Executive Order. The legal community is still trying to figure out just how far reaching this EO is, but it is likely to have a significant impact on a wide range of environmental regulations. These threats to the health of our environment put “America the Beautiful” at risk. The spacious skies, amber waves of grain, purple mountain majesties, and the fruited plain from sea to shining sea are left vulnerable. Now more than ever, Earth Day calls on all of us to act to protect our beautiful environment. Earth Day is now celebrated in over 190 countries. But its roots lie in a time when people refused to accept the destruction of the world around them as inevitable. So, what will you do this Earth Day? Because history has shown us: when people care, when they act together, the world changes. The debt to nature is still being called—and we still have the power to answer. This Earth Day, don’t just celebrate – participate. Plant a tree. Call your representatives. Learn the name of the bird outside your window. Donate to organizations that support our natural lands, our water, and our future. Vote. Teach your children not just to love the Earth, but to fight for it. Talk about climate change, even when it’s hard. Especially when it’s hard. Use your voice, use your art, use your science. Join a local cleanup, start a compost bin, reduce your plastic use. Talk to your neighbors. Talk to your parents. Talk to your children. You can’t wait for someone else to take action. You don’t need to be perfect. You don’t need to do everything. But you do need to begin. Because the Earth doesn’t need more perfect people, it needs millions of imperfect people who care enough to act with intention everyday. Sources: Klein, Ezra, and Thompson, Derek. Abundance . Simon & Schuster, 18 March 2025 “Gaylord Nelson & Earth Day Origins.” Nelson Earth Day , https://nelsonearthday.net/gaylord-nelson-earth-day-origins/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Gammon, Katharine. “The Deadly Donora Smog of 1948 Spurred Environmental Protection—But Have We Forgotten the Lesson?” Smithsonian Magazine , 26 Oct. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/deadly-donora-smog-1948-spurred-environmental-protection-have-we-forgotten-lesson-180970533/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Lamoreaux, Naomi. “The 1943 Hellish Cloud Was the Most Vivid Warning of L.A.'s Smog Problems to Come.” Smithsonian Magazine , 15 Jan. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1943-hellish-cloud-was-most-vivid-warning-las-smog-problems-come-180964119/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. “The Merrimack River: How Revisiting Its History Helps Renew Action.” Forest Society Blog , Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, 26 Sept. 2022, https://www.forestsociety.org/blog-post/merrimack-river-how-revisiting-its-history-helps-renew-action . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Pyne, Stephen J. “The Cuyahoga River Caught Fire at Least a Dozen Times, but No One Cared Until 1969.” Smithsonian Magazine , 22 June 2019, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/cuyahoga-river-caught-fire-least-dozen-times-no-one-cared-until-1969-180972444/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Westervelt, Eric. “How California’s Worst Oil Spill Turned Beaches Black and the Nation Green.” NPR , 28 Jan. 2019, https://www.npr.org/2019/01/28/688219307/how-californias-worst-oil-spill-turned-beaches-black-and-the-nation-green . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.