FIELD NOTES BLOG

Shoring up the Shoreline

Sydney Sherbitsky
December 18, 2024

Shoreline Stabilization

Shoreline stabilization involves implementing features at the water’s edge to limit sediment erosion to protect the land from wave action and currents. This process is a form of bioengineering, applying engineering principles to solve biological challenges. Stabilization measures can be "gray" (hard structures) or "green" (nature-based solutions), which affect the coastline's vulnerability and resilience. This significantly impacts economic, social, and ecological shoreline security. Economically, the shoreline may support infrastructure, tourism, and fisheries. Socially, shorelines provide space for recreation and community connection. Ecologically, the shoreline provides specialized habitat, water filtration, and exchange of materials. Given these factors, choosing the right stabilization method is crucial. This decision must consider wave strength, storm surge, flood capacity, space constraints, and ecological goals based on the type of shoreline being protected.

Gray Methods

Gray methods involve hard, engineered structures that include breakwaters, groins, bulkheads, seawalls, and concrete channels. Hard structures reflect wave energy and are most effective in areas with high wave intensity or strong currents because they are best at quickly breaking up water energy. They are best used when the main goal is to keep sediments in place, space is limited, and there is valuable infrastructure close to the shoreline.  However, gray methods have drawbacks. They offer little to no ecosystem benefits, provide no flood water storage capacity, reduce water circulation leading to degraded water quality, and may cause additional erosion in unprotected areas.

Green Methods

Green methods use natural solutions including vegetation, beach nourishment, or restored coastal habitat such as marshes, dunes, riparian zones, or oyster reefs. These methods are human engineered to mimic the physical, biologic, geologic, and chemical processes that already occur in nature. These techniques are most effective in areas with lower water energy the vegetation can withstand, as they absorb wave energy over a larger area. Due to its greater space and permeable components, natural stabilization features have a large flood water storage capacity and can slow down water flow. Natural features offer several ecological benefits including improved water quality and enhanced habitats for wildlife. They also provide long-term sustainability by maintaining the connection between water and land for sediment, water, and nutrient exchange. However, natural methods require more space, and are less effective in high energy environments. Additionally, most contract work and regulatory policy is centered around traditional hardened gray shorelines, not natural shorelines, which can make the process challenging.

Mixing Methods for Balanced Solutions

In many cases, a combination of gray and green methods may offer the best solution for shoreline stabilization. By blending hard structures with natural features, projects can balance wave energy reflection, flood water capacity, and ecological benefits. This hybrid approach can be tailored to the specific needs, resources, and security level of each shoreline. Some recent shoreline stabilization projects local to Northern Illinois have aimed to achieve that balance.

Local Projects

  • The Illinois Beach State Park Shoreline Stabilization Project in Lake County was completed in September 2023. This project aimed to protect the last 2.2 miles of undeveloped natural shorelines along Lake Michigan in Illinois where it was previously eroding at a rate of 100 feet per year. The primary goal was to ensure the natural ecosystem of dunes, swales, marsh, and oak forest is preserved and protected for generations to come. The project involved the installation of offshore breakwater structures to decrease wave energy and slow sediment transport to reduce erosion. Habitat features, such as tern nests, limestone ledges, eco blocks, salvaged driftwood, and rock spurs, were also incorporated. This focus on habitat stabilization earned the project the Midwest’s first Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines Verification, which is a national rating system for resilient, ecological, and accessible waterfront projects. The combination of gray and green features ensures both environmental protection and public access to the beach.


  • The Keith Creek Corridor Study in Rockford outlines plans to restore 20 miles of creek and surrounding watershed which is currently subject to frequent flooding, poor water quality, and low public access. According to Lauren Kleve, an Environmental Planner for Region 1 Planning Council and main contact for the project: “The Keith Creek Corridor study recognizes the importance of bank stabilization efforts, prioritizing the portion of the creek near Churchill Park within the Keith Creek Neighborhood as it is located within a FEMA-identified floodplain. Stabilization efforts identified in the corridor study primarily include creek bed naturalization through removing the existing concrete channel, re-meandering the channel, planting native vegetation, and installing creekside riprap, which is a layer of large stones that protects soil from erosion in areas of high or concentrated flows. Current efforts of the Keith Creek Corridor study include identifying and applying for applicable grants to implement the study’s action items. Additionally, project partners have been working to acquire vacant and underutilized properties within the Keith Creek Corridor to repurpose them, mitigate flooding, and create a safe walkable community.” These green methods of creek naturalization and permeable greenspace acquisition will also slow the flow of the creek, enhance water quality, and add natural habitats.
  • The Beverly Park Floodplain Reconnection is in the grant stage of The Illinois EPA Green Infrastructure Grant Opportunities Grant. The neighborhood of Beverly Park is economically disadvantaged and a flood prone community. This proposed project in Rockford’s Kent Creek watershed seeks to restore the floodplain by replacing the steep cracked concrete channel with a gentler, more permeable creek bed instead of repairing the channel. This naturalized area will increase flood water storage capacity, slow water flow, improve water quality, and restore riparian habitat with native vegetation. Beyond ecological benefits, this green methods project reduces flood risk as well as provides future green space and educational opportunities on stormwater pollution and naturalization benefits.

Takeaways

Severson Dells Nature Center is working on our own green method shoreline restoration at the former Elliot Golf Course. This project will bring the creek back to the surface in a process known as daylighting the creek. This project will improve water quality and reintroduce native plant species along the riverbanks to provide habitat and improve floodwater resilience. For more information on Elliot restoration check out our Science of Rewilding blog post.

Shoreline stabilization is a critical tool for protecting coastlines for ecological health, community connection, and supporting local economies. Whether using gray hard structures or green natural methods, the goal is to enhance resilience and ensure long term sustainability. Local projects in Illinois demonstrate how blending both approaches can achieve a balanced, effective solution for shoreline protection.


Sources

RECENT ARTICLES

By Bruce Muench April 25, 2025
Forward:
By Rowan Mermel April 23, 2025
“Once you see it you can’t unsee it”
April 22, 2025
From the rugged peaks of the Rocky Mountains to golden desert canyons, the rolling prairies to the ancient, mist-shrouded Appalachian mountains — America is a land rich in many beauties. We are home to the towering redwoods of the west coast, sun-drenched coastlines in the south, and the deep blues of the Great Lakes that collectively hold the largest volume of freshwater on Earth. These wild places offer a kind of quiet that stirs the soul. This vast, varied land is what we proudly call “America the Beautiful.” And on Earth Day, this is the America we celebrate. We scroll through snapshots of National Parks, photos of mountain trails, canyon vistas, tidepools, and wildflower filled prairies. Maybe we've seen these places with our own eyes — maybe we carry them like a dream we hope to one day reach. We’ve all, in some way, been struck by the beauty of this land. As I write these words, I’m sitting at my desk looking out the window into the woodland of Severson Dells, watching the first green buds emerge, listening to the fluting whistles of returning songbirds. How lucky are we to live among such beauty? But that beauty is in danger. Today, mountaintops in Appalachia are being blown apart for coal, their peaks stripped and valleys buried in rubble. Ancient forests in the Pacific Northwest are leveled for lumber, their centuries-old trees felled in minutes. Oil rigs rise like metal skeletons in Alaska’s fragile tundra, while pipelines thread through sacred Indigenous lands and important wildlife corridors. Wetlands that once buffered our coastlines from hurricanes are drained and filled. Prairies, once stretching unbroken across the heart of the continent like an ocean of grass, are disappearing under pavement and plow. Our coastlines are receding. Our coral reefs, once vibrant, are dying, bleaching bone-white. Even here, outside my window, invasive honeysuckle strangles the understory where spring ephemerals once bloomed, and the chorus of birds is quieter than it used to be — a stark reminder that nearly one-third of North American bird populations have vanished in the past fifty years. But this isn’t a new story. Ours is not the first generation to witness the cost of ‘progress’. The tension between beauty and destruction has shaped this nation since the Industrial Revolution. And while the challenges we face today are daunting, they are not insurmountable. Every year, on April 22nd, we celebrate Earth Day – a day that itself was born from a moment not unlike our own. America of the 1950’s and 60’s is almost unrecognizable from the America we know today. In 1943, Los Angeles residents awoke one morning to skies so dark and chemical-laden they feared they were under a gas attack . It was smog. Just 5 years later, a lethal blanket of smog from zinc smelters in Pennsylvania killed 20 people in just three days . The Merrimack River in New Hampshire ran a different color each day , depending on what the local mills were dumping. And in 1969, Cleveland's Cuyahoga River — thick with oil and industrial waste — burst into flames , its smoke billowing four stories high. These weren’t isolated incidents. They were the symptoms of a larger crisis—one brought on by decades of industrial expansion with few, if any, environmental safeguards. At the same time that America was enjoying unprecedented prosperity, it was also polluting its air, poisoning its rivers, and sickening its people. The economy boomed, but the environmental consequences were growing harder to ignore. In 1962, a marine biologist named Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, a book that would become a cornerstone of the modern environmental movement. Carson’s work focused on the effects of chemical pesticides—especially DDT—on ecosystems and human health. She warned of a future without birdsong, where toxins accumulated in the food chain and sickened both wildlife and people. Silent Spring struck a chord. It didn’t just present scientific facts, it gave voice to a deep, growing unease. People were already noticing the changes around them: the absence of fireflies in summer, the increasing number of fish kills in local lakes, the haze that lingered over cities for days. Carson’s words helped connect the dots, and it didn’t just inform, it inspired, and from it spurred the beginning of the environmental movement. By the late 1960s, a wave of activism was sweeping the country. Young people were leading protests against the Vietnam War, civil rights leaders were marching for justice, and college campuses had become hotbeds of political energy. Watching this cultural shift with inspiration was Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin. A long-time advocate for environmental protection, Nelson saw how the antiwar movement had galvanized young people—and he wondered whether that same passion could be channeled into fighting a different kind of crisis: the growing threat to America’s air, water, and land. His sense of urgency only deepened in early 1969, when tragedy struck the California coast. A blowout at a Union Oil drilling platform off the coast of Santa Barbara spilled nearly 100,000 barrels of crude oil into the Pacific Ocean . Black sludge washed up on miles of pristine beaches. Seabirds lay dying under slicks of oil. Dolphins and seals washed ashore. The air reeked of petroleum for weeks. The images were devastating—and they were broadcast into homes across the nation. Senator Nelson knew the time to act was now. In November of that year, he announced plans for a "National Teach-In on the Crisis of the Environment" —a day when Americans would come together to learn, protest, and push for meaningful environmental change. This name was later changed to Earth Day, and the date chosen was April 22, 1970—strategically placed between spring break and final exams to ensure strong participation on college campuses.  To bring this ambitious vision to life, Nelson turned to Denis Hayes, a 25-year-old student activist. With Hayes’ help, a 7 month timeline, and a shoestring budget of just $124,000, Earth Day sparked an unprecedented nationwide movement. College campuses began planning teach-ins and events. Newspapers picked up the story. Civic groups, churches, and schools joined in. The momentum built quickly—and organically. Within a few months, the Earth Day idea had become a nationwide grassroots event supported by millions of people. Colleges campuses across the country organized “teach- ins”, and major newspapers were writing about Senator Nelson's ideas. Earth Day may have been Gaylord Nelson’s idea, but American citizens made it happen. “Earth Day worked because of the spontaneous response at the grassroots level,” reflected Gaylord Nelson. “It organized itself.” Historian Adam Rome would later call it “the most famous unknown event in modern American history.” On April 22, 1970, an estimated 20 million Americans—nearly 10% of the U.S. population at the time —participated in what remains the largest single-day political demonstration in the nation’s history. People from all walks of life gathered for marches, cleanups, rallies, and teach-ins. The message was clear: the environment mattered, and the public was ready to fight for it. What made Earth Day so powerful was not just its scale, but its unity. The movement crossed ideological lines. It was bipartisan, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. At a time of deep national division, Earth Day reminded Americans that the health of our planet is a shared responsibility—and a common cause. Even more remarkable is that this enormous, coordinated event was pulled off without the tools we rely on today. No social media. No email. No cell phones. Just passionate people, printed flyers, rotary phones, and the belief that change was possible. The success of Earth Day didn’t just move the public—it resonated with leaders in Washington, and led to real change. In just a few years, the United States went from having almost no federal environmental policy to enacting an environmental policy infrastructure strong enough to slow down the era of unregulated industrial sprawl to protect our planet and public health. The success of the first Earth Day led to the passage of some of the most important environmental legislation in American history, including: The Clean Air Act (1970) The Clean Water Act (1972) The Endangered Species Act (1973) President Richard Nixon oversaw the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency and signed the above landmark environmental laws into effect. In a 1970 speech, Nixon captured the spirit of the moment with a message that still rings true today: “The great question of the seventies is, shall we surrender to our surroundings, or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land, and to our water? Restoring nature to its natural state is a cause beyond party and beyond factions. It has become a common cause of all the people of this country. It is a cause of particular concern to young Americans, because they, more than we, will reap the grim consequences of our failure to act on programs which are needed now if we are to prevent disaster later. Clean air, clean water, open spaces—these should once again be the birthright of every American. If we act now, they can be. We still think of air as free. But clean air is not free, and neither is clean water. The price tag on pollution control is high. Through our years of past carelessness we incurred a debt to nature, and now that debt is being called. ” In the years that followed the first Earth Day, America made progress—rivers stopped catching fire, cities began to breathe a little easier, and wildlife rebounded. But the work was never meant to end in the 1970s. Earth Day is a reminder that the environment is not a limitless resource, and that protecting it requires action, accountability, and cooperation. Fifty five years later we face new environmental challenges, but Earth day is a reminder of what we can accomplish when we come together, regardless of party or background, to protect the natural world we all share. Today, the landmark pieces of legislation that were established in the 1970’s are under threat. The first hit to the Clean Water Act was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA, which significantly narrowed the Act's scope, limiting protections for wetlands and many streams. This ruling has led to a significant weakening of federal oversight. More recently, the EPA has announced significant changes to the Clean Water Act that potentially puts the drinking water sources for tens of millions of Americans at risk. As for the Endangered Species Act, there is a proposed rule change that would limit violations of the Act only to actions that hurt or kill animals. Harming the habitats the endangered animals need to survive would no longer be a violation of the Endangered Species Act, which would open large swaths of land to logging, mining and development that were previously protected. As we all know, if a species doesn’t have the habitat to survive and breed in then it will eventually go extinct. This proposed rule change is open for public comment until May 19 in the Federal Register, so please consider sharing your opinion . Additionally, there is the Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy Executive Order. The legal community is still trying to figure out just how far reaching this EO is, but it is likely to have a significant impact on a wide range of environmental regulations. These threats to the health of our environment put “America the Beautiful” at risk. The spacious skies, amber waves of grain, purple mountain majesties, and the fruited plain from sea to shining sea are left vulnerable. Now more than ever, Earth Day calls on all of us to act to protect our beautiful environment. Earth Day is now celebrated in over 190 countries. But its roots lie in a time when people refused to accept the destruction of the world around them as inevitable. So, what will you do this Earth Day? Because history has shown us: when people care, when they act together, the world changes. The debt to nature is still being called—and we still have the power to answer. This Earth Day, don’t just celebrate – participate. Plant a tree. Call your representatives. Learn the name of the bird outside your window. Donate to organizations that support our natural lands, our water, and our future. Vote. Teach your children not just to love the Earth, but to fight for it. Talk about climate change, even when it’s hard. Especially when it’s hard. Use your voice, use your art, use your science. Join a local cleanup, start a compost bin, reduce your plastic use. Talk to your neighbors. Talk to your parents. Talk to your children. You can’t wait for someone else to take action. You don’t need to be perfect. You don’t need to do everything. But you do need to begin. Because the Earth doesn’t need more perfect people, it needs millions of imperfect people who care enough to act with intention everyday. Sources: Klein, Ezra, and Thompson, Derek. Abundance . Simon & Schuster, 18 March 2025 “Gaylord Nelson & Earth Day Origins.” Nelson Earth Day , https://nelsonearthday.net/gaylord-nelson-earth-day-origins/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Gammon, Katharine. “The Deadly Donora Smog of 1948 Spurred Environmental Protection—But Have We Forgotten the Lesson?” Smithsonian Magazine , 26 Oct. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/deadly-donora-smog-1948-spurred-environmental-protection-have-we-forgotten-lesson-180970533/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Lamoreaux, Naomi. “The 1943 Hellish Cloud Was the Most Vivid Warning of L.A.'s Smog Problems to Come.” Smithsonian Magazine , 15 Jan. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1943-hellish-cloud-was-most-vivid-warning-las-smog-problems-come-180964119/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. “The Merrimack River: How Revisiting Its History Helps Renew Action.” Forest Society Blog , Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, 26 Sept. 2022, https://www.forestsociety.org/blog-post/merrimack-river-how-revisiting-its-history-helps-renew-action . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Pyne, Stephen J. “The Cuyahoga River Caught Fire at Least a Dozen Times, but No One Cared Until 1969.” Smithsonian Magazine , 22 June 2019, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/cuyahoga-river-caught-fire-least-dozen-times-no-one-cared-until-1969-180972444/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Westervelt, Eric. “How California’s Worst Oil Spill Turned Beaches Black and the Nation Green.” NPR , 28 Jan. 2019, https://www.npr.org/2019/01/28/688219307/how-californias-worst-oil-spill-turned-beaches-black-and-the-nation-green . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.